Im Kamingespräch mit Goodman Games – Teil 2: Rund um den Verlag

Zweiter Teil des Interview mit Joseph Goodman und Harley Stroh. Den ersten Teil findet ihr hier (auch in englisch).

Argamae: Was war die Initialzündung für Goodman Games? Wie kamst Du dazu, einen Rollenspielverlag zu gründen?

Joseph: Nun, ich möchte das beantworten, indem ich noch einen Schritt zurück mache. Mein Bruder und ich schrieben vor vielen Jahren ein unabhängiges Magazin für Warhammer 40.000. Wir taten das, weil wir das Spiel pausenlos gespielt haben und schon einen Riesenbatzen Material aus eigener Feder angehäuft hatten. Mit Goodman Games verhielt es sich ähnlich: Ich habe an Spielen gearbeitet, immer viel geschrieben und – ganz ehrlich – es liegt mir im Blut. Wäre es nicht Goodman Games geworden, hätte ich jetzt ein anderes Spiele-Projekt.

Argamae: Wie bist Du zu Goodman Games gekommen, Harley?

Harley: Nach dem College trennte sich meine heimatliche Spielrunde. Einige heirateten, andere zogen der Arbeit wegen fort. Schnell hatte ich keine Leute mehr, für die ich Spielrunden leiten konnte. Aber ich vermisste das Spielleiten, daher schrieb ich ein Abenteuer für einen meiner alten Freunde und schickte es seiner neuen Gruppe zu. Dieses Abenteuer sollte dann mein erstes DCC werden: Legacy of the Savage Kings.

Argamae: Wie stehst Du generell zu der Old-School-Bewegung und den vielen Spielen/Blogs, die seitdem existieren?

Harley: Ich bin ein großer Fan der OSR, von Retroklonen und den old-school-blogs, denn dort haben wir Spieler, die aus reiner Liebe zum Spiel ihre Abenteuer entwerfen, schreiben und veröffentlichen. Ihre Leidenschaft ist eine Inspiration und zeigt den wahren Geist aus den Anfangstagen des Rollenspiels.

Joseph: Ich glaube, das die OSR eine gute Sache ist. Und ich hoffe, das sie auch weiterhin eine positive Kraft bleibt und der gelegentliche Streit nicht die ganze Community entflammt. Hier haben wir eine Fangemeinde, die durch ein gemeinsames Interesse verbunden ist und sich an den Möglichkeiten digitaler Veröffentlichungen für den Sandkasten ihrer Jugend erfreuen. Laßt uns an unserem gemeinsamen Interesse Spaß haben und andere dafür begeistern.

Argamae: In welche Produktreihen von GG bist du hauptsächlich involviert, Harley?

Harley: Ich darf mich glücklich schätzen, für mehrere Produktreihen gearbeitet zu haben. So habe ich für die Dungeon Crawl Classics unter 3.5 und 4E geschrieben, die ersten Abenteuer der Master-Dungeon-Reihe verfasst sowie das erste Abenteuer für Age of Cthulhu. Jetzt liegt mein Hauptaugenmerk aber auf dem Abenteuerschreiben für unser bevorstehendes Dungeon Crawl Classics Rollenspiel.

Argamae: Abgesehen von Deinen eigenen Produkten – welche Rollenspiele magst Du sonst noch besonders gern?

Joseph: Ich spiele eine Menge Spiele, aber meine Rollenspielaktivitäten konzentrieren sich auf das DCC-Rollenspiel und andere Varianten von D&D. Auf dem weiten Feld sonstiger Spiele bin ich ein großer Fan der Euro-Brettspiele, insbesondere Puerto Rico, Carcassonne und andere in dieser Richtung. Ich stehe auf Star-Wars-Miniaturen und Risk 2210 AD. Kürzlich spiele ich mit meiner Familie viel Bananagrams und Gobblet. Meine Lieblings-Convention ist der GaryCon, hauptsächlich, weil dort offenes Spiel besonders betont wird. Letztes Jahr habe ich sehr viel DCC-Rollenspiel betrieben und danach SEHR VIELE Brettspiele im unteren, offenen Spielbereich ausprobiert. Es hat großen Spaß gemacht.

Harley: Ich bin ein großer Fan des Warhammer-Universums, wenn ich auch nie die Zeit hatte, ihre Table-Top-Spiele zu sammeln oder zu spielen. Ich bin noch immer auf der Suche nach einem sauberen, eleganten Wargaming-System, daß ich mit meiner alten Spielrunde an einem Nachmittag spielen kann.

Argamae: Wie viele TPK (Total Party Kills) gab es schon in Deinen Runden?

Harley: Das Risiko eines TPK ist immer da, aber gern sehe ich so etwas nicht am Spieltisch… schließlich soll ein Spiel ja Spaß machen. Aber ja, beim Testspielen neuer Abenteuer habe ich mindestens einen TPK pro Modul. Zu Anfang hatten wir einige wirklich schreckliche, mit zweistelligen Charaktertoden in einigen 0-Stufen-DCC.

Joseph: Tatsächlich eine ganze Menge. Die niedrigen Stufen des DCC-Rollenspiels bringen viele Charaktertode mit sich, darunter auch der gelegentliche TPK. Aber ein TPK sollte nicht das Ende deines Spiels bedeuten. Wenn alle Charaktere draufgehen, schicke sie in die Hölle oder eine der äußeren Ebenen, wo sich ihre Seelen den Weg zurück zur materiellen Ebene freikämpfen müssen. Das DCC-Rollenspiel dreht sich um genau solche Arten von Abenteuern – Quests und Reisen, um die Macht deines Charakters zu erhöhen. Nicht einfach nur Regeln.

Argamae: Welches war das erinnerungswürdigste Monster, dem Du in einer Rollenspielrunde bislang begegnet bist?

Joseph: Der Schwammrhi. In der Runde, mit der ich aufwuchs, war ich immer der SL. Mit der Spielgruppe in meiner Mittelstufe schickte ich die Spieler in eine Inselhöhle, die vom fürchterlichen Schwammrhi besetzt war. Es war ein gigantischer, zweiköpfiger Drache, der gegen ihn gerichtete Zaubersprüche absorbieren konnte, um sie dann gegen den Zaubernden einzusetzen. Wie ein Schwamm eben… na, verstanden? In der Mittelstufe dachte ich, das sei ziemlich clever.

Harley: Ein Dracolich, ziemlich früh in den Tagen von AD&D. Während einer einzigen Überraschungsrunde tötete er die gesamte Gruppe – bis auf den Paladin, der noch 3 Trefferpunkte übrig hatte. Wir würfelten die Initiative für die nächste Runde aus und der Paladin gewann. Er holte seinen Wunschring heraus und wünschte sich die gesamte Welt zurück in der Zeit, wodurch er die Gruppe vor ihrer sicheren Auslöschung bewahrte.

Argamae: Wo siehst Du den Fokus der Age-of-Cthulhu-Abenteuerreihe: Ermittlung oder Kampf?

Harley: Ermittlung. Zum Kampf kommt es erst dann, wenn jede andere Option fehlgeschlagen ist… oder wenn der alte Professor wahnsinnig wird.

Joseph: Von beidem ein bißchen, wie man wohl auch aus den Abenteuern erkennen kann.

Argamae: Wie pulpig darf Cthulhu sein? Glaubst Du, daß Lovecraft die üblichen Kriterien für klassische Pulp-Fiktion erfüllte?

Harley: In meinen Cthulhu-Runden finde ich Pulp gut, aber ich weiß, das dies nicht jedermanns Geschmack ist. Und das ist auch gut so. Aber um meiner eigenen geistigen Verfassung willen muss ich dem unablässigen Grauen eines gleichgültigen Universums etwas Leichtes entgegenstellen. Sonst wird mir diese zermürbende Hoffnungslosigkeit einfach zu viel.

Joseph: Lovecrafts Geschichten haben einen sehr besonderen Stil, der sicherlich nicht so dramatisch ist wie in vielen der klassischen Groschenromane. Aber einige seiner Geschichten haben ihre dramatischen Momente. Zum Beispiel wäre da die Konfrontation am Ende von „Der Fall des Charles Dexter Ward“ (die ich erst kürzlich gelesen habe und mir daher gerade einfällt). So, wie es für D&D verschiedene Spielstile gibt, glaube ich, das es auch für das Cthulhu-Rollenspiel verschiedene Stile geben kann – für die verschiedenen Stile seiner Geschichten als auch für die verschiedenen Auffassungen zur Spielweise seitens der Spieler.

Harley: Lovecraft war der Meister. Er zapfte das Grauen der Gegenwart an, um kulturelle Themen hervorzubringen, die bis heute spürbar sind. Wenngleich mir Leiber und Howard mehr liegen, kann ich die Meisterhaftigkeit von Lovecrafts Werken nicht leugnen.

Argamae: Was war die Inspiration zu Xcrawl und seinen Abenteuern? Wie wurde es von der Spielerschaft angenommen?

Harley: Xcrawl ist ein tolles Spiel, aber es ist nicht meines Geistes Kind. Joseph wird diese Frage beantworten

Joseph: Ich wünschte, ich könnte die Lorbeeren für Xcrawl einheimsen, aber das Genie dahinter ist mein Freund Brendan LaSalle. Xcrawl besitzt die beste Entstehungsgeschichte für ein Rollenspiel: Brendan schuf das Konzept als Teil seiner bestehenden D&D-Kampagne vor über zehn Jahren. Das dann veröffentlichte Spiel ist buchstäblich ein Auswuchs seines persönlichen Spielstiles. Xcrawl hat eine leidenschaftliche Fangemeinde und wir haben nicht vor, sie zu enttäuschen. Mein nächstes Hauptprojekt nach dem DCC-Rollenspiel ist Maximum Xcrawl, Brendans Vision des Spiels für die nächste Generation. Diese Version wird Pathfinder als Regelbasis verwenden und das gesamte Spiel von Anfang bis Ende generalüberholen. Etwa zwei Jahre hat Brendan diese Pathfinder-Verion getestet und mir kürzlich das endgültige Manuskript eingereicht. Es sieht sehr zugkräftig aus und ich glaube, es wird ein großer Hit. Natürlich werde ich zunächst das DCC-Rollenspiel unter Dach und Fach bringen, daher wird wohl noch ein Jahr ins Land ziehen, bevor unsere Spielefans Maximum Xcrawl zu Gesicht bekommen, aber man kann sich jetzt schon darauf freuen. Ich glaube, ihr werdet es lieben.

Interview with Goodman Games – Part 2: And the rest

Second part of the interview with Joseph Goodman and Harley Stroh. The first part you will find here, the translation of the German part one there. Part 2 in German will follow today evening.

Argamae: What was the initial spark for Goodman Games? What was your reason to establish a roleplaying company?

Joseph: Well, let me answer one step before that. My brother and I created an independent magazine for Warhammer 40,000 many years ago. We did that because we played the game constantly and had amassed a wealth of material that we had created. Goodman Games was similar: I’ve always worked on games, I’ve always written quite a bit, and frankly it’s in my blood. If it hadn’t been Goodman Games it would have been some other gaming project.

Argamae: How did you get onboard with Goodman Games, Harley?

Harley: After college, my home gaming group parted ways. Some of us got married, others moved away for work, and I quickly found myself without anyone to run games for. Even though I didn’t have a gaming group, I still missed running games, so I wrote an adventure for one of my old friends and sent it to his new group. That adventure turned out to be my first DCC, Legacy of the Savage Kings.

Argamae: What is your general position towards the old school movement and the many games and blogs that flourish in its wake?

Harley: I’m a big fan of the OSR, retroclones and the old-school blogs. These are gamers that design, write and publish for the sheer love of the game. Their passion is inspiring and true to the origins of role playing games.

Joseph: I think the OSR is a good thing. I hope that it continues to be a positive force, and the occasional argument doesn’t overwhelm the community. This is a group of fans united by a common interest, and enjoying the opportunities for digital publishing in the sandbox of one’s youth. Let’s enjoy our common interests and keep promoting them.

Argamae: What Goodman Games product lines are you primarily involved with?

Harley: I’ve been lucky enough to contribute to a number of the lines. I’ve written for the 3.5 and 4e Dungeon Crawl Classics, written the first adventures for the Master Dungeon line, and the first adventure for Age of Cthulhu. But now my work is primarily focused on writing adventures for our upcoming Dungeon Crawl Classics RPG.

Argamae: Apart from your own products what other roleplaying games do fancy the most?

Joseph: I play a lot of games but most of my RPG activity is centered round DCC RPG and other variants of D&D. In the broader pool of games I’m a big fan of Euro board games, particularly Puerto Rico, Carcassonne, and others of that ilk. I love Star Wars miniatures and Risk 2210 AD. Lately I’ve been playing Bananagrams and Gobblet a lot with my family. My favorite convention is GaryCon, in large part because of the heavy emphasis on open gaming. Last year I played a lot of DCC RPG and then a LOT of board games down in the open gaming area — it was great fun.

Harley: I’m a big fan of the Warhammer universe, though I’ve never had the time to collect or play any of their war games. I’m still on the hunt for a clean, elegant system war game that I can play with my old gaming crew in an afternoon.

Argamae: How many TPKs did you experience in your own gaming groups?

Harley: While there is always the risk of a TPK, I don’t like seeing them at the table … the game is supposed to be fun after all. But yes, while playtesting new adventures, I usually have at least 1 TPK per module. We had some terrible ones early on, with double digit character deaths in some of the 0-level DCCs.

Joseph: Quite a few, actually. The lower levels of DCC RPG involve a lot of character deaths and the occasional TPK. But a TPK shouldn’t be the end of your game. If all the characters die, send them to Hell or one of the outer planes, where their souls then have to fight their way back to the material plane. DCC RPG is about that kind of adventure – quests and journeys to raise your character’s power level, not simply rules.

Argamae: Which was the most memorable monster you ever encountered in one of your roleplaying sessions?

Joseph: The spongerhi. I was always the DM in my home group growing up. In my middle school gaming group, I sent the players to an island cavern occupied by the dread spongerhi. It was this gigantic two-headed dragon that would absorb spells cast against it, then use that magic against the caster. Like a sponge – get it? I thought it was very clever when I was in middle school.

Harley: A dracolich, early on in the days of AD&D. In a single surprise round it killed the entire party except for the paladin, who was left with 3 hit points. We rolled initiative for the next round and the paladin won. He pulled out his ring of wishes and wished the entire world back in time, saving the party from certain destruction.

Argamae: What would you say is the focus of the Age of Cthulhu adventures: investigation or combat?

Harley: Investigation. Combat happens when every other option has failed … or when the old professor goes mad.

Joseph: A little of both, as you can probably tell from the adventures

Argamae: How much pulp is okay for Cthulhu? Do you think that Lovecraft’s tales “ticked all the boxes” for classical pulp fiction?

Harley: I enjoy pulp in my Cthulhu, but I know this isn’t to everyone’s taste, which is fine. But, for my own personal sanity, I need to balance the unrelenting horror of an uncaring universe with a bit of levity. Otherwise the grinding hopelessness is just too much.

Joseph: Lovecraft’s fiction is a very specific style that certainly isn’t as dramatic as much of the “classic” pulp fiction. But some of his stories do have their dramatic moments. For example, the final confrontation in The Case of Charles Dexter Ward (which I just read recently and have top of mind). Just as there are different styles of play for D&D, I believe there can be different styles of play for Call of Cthulhu, which emphasize different styles of his fiction and different player preferences for game play.

Harley: Lovecraft was the master. He tapped into horror of the present to extract cultural themes that resonate to this day. While I will always prefer Lieber or Howard, there is no denying the mastery of Lovecraft’s works.

Argamae: What inspired you to make Xcrawl and its adventures? How was it received from gaming audiences?

Harley: XCrawl is an amazing game, but it’s not my brainchild. Joseph will have the answer this.

Joseph: I wish I could take credit for Xcrawl, but the genius behind it is my friend Brendan LaSalle. Xcrawl has the best kind of origin story for an RPG: Brendan created the concept as part of his ongoing D&D campaign, more than a decade ago, and the published game is actually the outgrowth of his personal style of play. Xcrawl has built a dedicated fan base and we have no intention of letting them down. My next major project after DCC RPG is Maximum Xcrawl, which is Brendan’s next-generation vision for the game. This will be a Pathfinder-powered version of Xcrawl that streamlines the whole game from start to finish. Brendan has been play testing the Pathfinder version for about two years and submitted the final manuscript to me recently. It’s looking very strong and I think it will be a big hit. Of course I have to get DCC RPG put to bed first, so it will be a year or so before gaming fans get to see Maximum Xcrawl, but it’s something to look forward to and I believe it will be very popular.

Interview with Goodman Games – Part 1: About the DCCs

First part of our Interview with Joseph Goodman and Harley Stroh. Second part and German version will follow shortly.

Argamae: Was there a specific reason for making the Dungeon Crawl Classics line? You count among the forerunners of the OSR (old school renaissance) or would you disagree?

Harley: This is one for Joseph. He began the original DCC line before my hiring with the company.)

Joseph: When I published Dungeon Crawl Classics #1: Idylls of the Rat King in 2003, it was one of the only products available – whether commercial or amateur – that could be described as “old school.” As sales took off for the DCC line, it became clear to me that there was a market for a subject I am interested in, which was a specific sort of nostalgic dungeon crawl experience. Five years later, Grognardia first came online, and the OSR began to build solid momentum just as 4E was also being launched. I’m sure I wasn’t the only renaissance gamer excited to find like-minded compatriots in the OSR blogosphere. As I transitioned Goodman Games to publish more 4E modules, I found myself continually interested by projects related to a simpler, faster game experience than what 4E offers. I was also diving deep into Appendix N, and had decided to read every book in the bibliography. Alongside all of these events was my continuing interest in the aesthetics of early D&D and the books of Appendix N – not just the great artists of TSR, who we’re all familiar with, but the generations before them, such as the covers for Weird Tales, the art of Frank R. Paul and Virgil Finlay, and the look of the 1970′s magazines and comics that many of us associate (consciously or not) with our earliest D&D experiences. DCC RPG is a confluence of all these events: the success of the DCC line, the burgeoning market for retro-style products, the gathering momentum of the OSR, my personal interest in a simpler form of D&D, my desire to create a gaming experience that expresses the spirit of adventure that I find in Appendix N, and my interest in a visual experience that conjures up the purest form of D&D reminiscences. In many ways, DCC RPG is the culmination of a journey that began for me nine years ago with the publication of DCC #1. I really feel like everything I have gone through over the last nine years has led me here, at least from a gaming perspective. DCC RPG is the game I’ve always wanted to play – and, in many ways, is the game I always have played, just under different names.

Argamae: What is your favourite DCC module?

Joseph: DCC #71: The 13th Skull, which I wrote for DCC RPG. I’m cheating a little bit by picking one of my own modules here! That way I don’t have to pick which of the many fine DCC authors I like the most. The 13th Skull is a module I wrote and ran during DCC RPG playtests. I’ve run the adventure many times and it both reads and plays very well. I also really like how the cover art turned out; my friend Doug Kovacs has been doing the cover illustrations for DCC RPG modules and he did an inspiring job on this one. Thirteen generations ago, the ambitious first Duke of Magnussen made a fell pact with an unknown power, who asked for but one thing in return: the thirteenth daughter born to a Magnussen duke. Now, generations hence, the daughter of Duke Magnussen XIII is stolen away by a hooded executioner riding a leathery beast. As it wings back across the city walls to drop behind the Duke’s mountain-top keep, all who watch know it alights in the Magnussen family crypts, where the devilish secrets of thirteen generations have been buried and forgotten – until now…

Harley: With over fifty adventures, it is hard to choose a favorite. However, DCC 17, Legacy of the Savage Kings remains very close to my heart. It was the first DCC I wrote for Goodman Games, and in many ways it remains the best.

Argamae: Did you ever encounter unexpected problems when bringing the DCCs from 3e to 4E? Such as?

Harley: The biggest surprise was the success and utility of the character builder and the digital tools. The inability of third party publishers to contribute to the digital content of 4e proved to be a great challenge. Products that were hugely successful in 3e and 3.5 were suddenly obsolete under 4e. While WotC’s digital initiative has encountered a number of hurdles in its roll out, it also proved to be a game changer for third party publishers.

Joseph: Yes, quite a few. As I’m sure many fans recall, Wizards of the Coast offered a 4E license, known as the GSL, and there were many twists and turns in that process. I gained a lot of publisher XP during that time.

Argamae: What formats for the DCC line do you plan for the future? For example, will there be more 2$ modules or another DCC with a soundtrack CD?

Joseph: Lately I find myself gravitating toward short adventures that can be read by the GM in a couple hours, and then provide a couple sessions’ worth of play experience. Call it my personal preference if you’d like, or perhaps the hallmark of being an older gamer with family, but that’s the style of game I personally find easiest to run, and I think it’s a style of publishing that offers the lowest barriers to entry. Based on that, I’m steering the DCC line toward shorter adventure modules – in the 16 to 24 page range. Ironically, because DCC RPG uses such a concise stats format, a 16 page module under DCC RPG rules gives about as much play time as a much longer module under other editions of the rules. The Free RPG Day adventures will continue to grow more interesting, as this year’s Free RPG Day adventure will launch an adventure design contest that will reward readers both financially and creatively – and give a lucky fan the chance to put his adventure in front of several thousand gamers as the next year’s Free RPG Day module.

Argamae: What is your target audience for the upcoming DCC roleplaying game?

Joseph: Joseph Goodman is my target audience. I have said this before and I’ll say this again: I’m writing this game for me. It’s the game I’ve always wanted to play. Hopefully a few other folks will like it as well.

Argamae: What’s your recipe for an original and entertaining dungeon design? How do you get about?

Harley: Ideally, I want the players (and their characters) to overcome impossible odds, and to have an epic adventure that they will remember for years to come. To often, as DM and judges, we dial back our expectations, running trivial adventures early on and saving the epic adventures for the end of a campaign. But Beowulf didn’t have any “trivial” adventures. Whether level 1 or level 20, every adventure should be breath taking and memorable.

Joseph: Every writer has a different process, so I can only describe what works for me. And I must be clear that the process for publishing an entertaining module is very different from the process of writing one. Now, that said, my own writing process is a mix of strong visuals, lots of inspiration, and percolation time. I read extensively, including fiction (lots of Appendix N lately), comics, and art books. Typically I am “hit” with cool ideas for scenes or encounters, and I jot them in a notebook that has lots of random scribbles in it. Over time some of the scenes seem to connect to each other, and then I come up with a plot that connects them. Once I have an idea for the basic plot, I usually spend a long time getting the title right. Then and only then do I sit down to write it. After that comes the most important part: play testing. Many well-written modules don’t play that well, and vice versa; play testing is a requirement to really learn if a module gives not just a good reading experience but also a good playing experience. It’s easy for writers to forget that the players never see anything in the module – all the players know about the writer’s words are how the GM paraphrases them. You as the adventure writer have to give the GM strong, simple visual descriptions that can bring your scenes to life in his descriptions to the players. Playtesting is key to understanding if these scenes come across right, and to gauge the flow of the adventure’s encounters. I guess that’s a long-winded explanation but hopefully it makes sense.

Argamae: Are there any inquiries for foreign language editions of the DCC RPG yet? Is it reasonable to expect another German edition?

Joseph: There have been some inquiries. I would say that something’s definitely possible. If there are parties out there interested in a foreign language edition – either as a fan or as a publisher – they should get in contact with me.

Argamae: Did you ever receive direct feedback from a German DCC?

Harley: I haven’t been fortunate enough to receive feedback from a German language DCC, but I would love to hear some! We can always stand to improve our games

Joseph: Only in English!

Argamae: Did you approach Monte Cook for DCC #50 or did he approach you?

Harley: Joseph lined this one up. He can tell the tale. Although, I’m proud to share that Monte played in our DCC tournament the very next GenCon!

Joseph: Hmm, I’m trying to recollect. I think I approached him. But as I recall he was already a fan of the series and was interested in working on it. DCC #50 is still one of my favorite modules — the rotating map is awesome.

Argamae: Are there any plans to re-issue older DCCs (from 3e/4e) for the new DCC RPG?

Joseph: I have no plans to re-issue older DCC modules for DCC RPG. DCC RPG has many core concepts related to maintaining a distinctive spirit of adventure in the game, and earlier DCC modules did not follow those rules. One of my biggest goals with the game is to give players the same experience they had when they were young and discovering D&D for the first time. One of the best ways to do this is to create a sense of mystery and surprise – to leave the players constantly unsure of their opponents. Remember when a beholder was a mysterious opponent that you had no idea how to beat? DCC RPG has an extremely simple stat system for monsters, and encourages new monsters in every encounter. It also relies heavily on an Appendix N style of adventure, which is present in some 3E/4E modules but not all. I think that gamers who enjoyed our DCC modules in prior editions will enjoy the DCC RPG modules even more. There are very few publishers who can say they’ve published nearly 100 adventure modules and learned the lessons from that. I have the luxury to make such a claim, and I believe the new line of DCC RPG adventures will represent a style of adventure – and an ease of use and a beauty of presentation – that really is the best I’ve published in more than ten years of publishing.

Argamae: With the 2$ modules, the compilation “The Adventure Begins” and the 0-level-DCCs did you intend to reach newcomers to the hobby?

Harley: The hope is always to lower the hurdle for new gamers. Gamers that might not otherwise buy a DCC might find it hard to turn away a $2 DCC. And if it happens to bring in new gamers, all the better!

Joseph: Yes. All of those efforts helped tremendously, as did Free RPG Day, which was my idea; I co-created Free RPG Day with Aldo Ghiozzi of Impressions Marketing, which runs the event now. There’s a time and place for every opportunity, and those were all good initiatives at the right time and place to help expand the reach of the DCC line to both newcomers and established gamers.

Argamae: Could you explain briefly the process of making a DCC module (from the initial concept to the final version)? Can you remember a specific DCC module where this was especially tricky?

Harley: Any adventure begins with a pitch: a short synopsis that highlights the strengths of an adventure. Once an adventure receives the green light, the author designs the adventure and sketches any of the maps. Once the first draft is complete, we send it off to be playtested, either by the author, or – ideally – by strangers. The feedback from the playtests inform any revisions and corrections. Once the final draft is submitted the adventure is edited, and then sent off to layout and cartography. At the same time, we are commissioning artwork. Once the art and final maps are complete, the entire package is reviewed by proofreaders and editors for accuracy, before being sent off to print.

Joseph: DCC modules get made in one of two ways: either I pitch one to a writer, or they pitch an idea to me. When I first concepted the DCC line, I wrote down a list of every adventure I wanted to publish: “pirate adventure,” “dragon adventure,” “Egypt adventure,” etc. Over the course of several years I commissioned every adventure concept on this list from different writers. Of course they take it beyond the basic concept and turn it into something both good to read and fun to play. Right now I have a similar list of module ideas for DCC RPG, which is more inspired by Appendix N and its antecedents. My friend Harley Stroh, adventure writer extraordinaire, is writing the “giant brain” adventure right now — the “giant brain” image is a staple of pulp sci-fi (and sometimes horror and fantasy as well), and it would make an awesome cover image and a terrifying opponent if done right. Of course it has to be done in a way that makes sense for a fantasy RPG, and Harley can do that. On the other hand, some authors pitch me on ideas for their modules, and sometimes these make it to print. Once the author and I have agreed on a concept, the author turns in a map and encounter outline. We discuss the outline, then he goes into writing and play testing. As for where it gets tricky, well, writers are creative folks and sometimes they like to push the envelope. DCC #51: Castle Whiterock was actually commissioned as a much shorter module — 96 pages, if I remember correctly. The writers really got into it, and it ended up being 761 pages…

Harley: All in all, it is a very involved process, where any one step can hold up the entire release. The trickiest DCC, in terms of process, had to be our epic megadungeon, Whiterock Castle. While the adventure was in development for years, it fell to Joseph to kickstart the adventure into reality. A group of authors and editors met in Las Vegas, we were lined out the plan for Whiterock over the course of the weekend. Each member of the team was given specific deadlines, tasks and assignments, and each person was essential to ensuring that the box set be completed on time. By the end of the weekend we were all joking that if any single person got hurt or sick, we would miss our due date. It was a joke, but the joke was founded in reality: if any one person missed their goals, Whiterock would have missed its deadline and not made it to GenCon.

Argamae: How are the playtests conducted? Do you have fixed test groups or could anyone approach you for becoming a playtester?

Harley: While we do have playtest groups that we rely upon, the best playtesters are always strangers. We always welcome new playtesters, although it can be hard for groups to make time to try out DCCs when they are also running home campaigns. This is why so many of our DCCs are playtested at conventions.

Joseph: Anyone can approach me. For DCC RPG, I ran many games myself to make sure everything went smoothly. I wrote 3 of the first 8 DCC RPG modules, and I’ve played each of them at least a half-dozen times, if not more. Running the same adventure so many times is interesting…eventually I get bored and start changing stuff on the fly. But sometimes the players make interesting in-game decisions and it suddenly seems fresh again. Anyway, back on topic, other parties also ran play tests of the first-generation DCC RPG modules, including some of the outside play testing groups that helped me make sure everything was balanced. And of course all modules written by an outside author have to be play tested by that author and his own group.

Argamae: Did you read all of the DCCs yourself?

Harley: I pride myself in reading every DCC that comes out.

Joseph: Yes. There have been times when I’ve had dedicated line editors who do more of the, shall we say, “narrowing of the candidates” for me. Over the years I’ve gone back and forth between how much I’ve relied on line editors versus my own engagement. For DCC RPG to be “right” I knew I had to be personally engaged very heavily, so I have been personally involved in all aspects of the DCC RPG modules.

Age of Cthulhu – Cthulhu-Material von Goodman Games

Goodman Games ist bisher bekannt für seine originelle Dungeon Crawl Classic-Reihe für DnD 3rd und 4th (deutsch von Ulisses), aber auch für Xcrawl, Etherscope oder Broncosaurus Rex. Nun will man unter BRP-Lizenz Cthulhu mit Abenteuern bereichern. Eine Vereinbarung mit Chaosium wurde unterzeichnet. Die Reihe von Goodman Games soll Age of Cthulhu heißen, erstes Abenteuer wird Death in Luxor werden und ist für Dezember 2008 geplant. Autor wird Harley Stroh sein, der sich schon durch einige originelle DCCs hervorgetan hat.

-> http://www.goodman-games.com./7001preview.html

Death in Luxor soll die Investigatoren nach Ägypten führen, wo Wahnsinn die Archäologen des Chicago House im Griff hat. Korrupter Polizei, einer wunderschöne Theosophistin und Kultisten, besessen vom Gedanken den Schrecken aus einer anderen Zeit zu beschwören, werden die Charaktere begegnen, während sie den mysteriösen Tod von Professor Bollacher und seinem Team enträtseln, hoffentlich bevor altertümliche Riten zu einem schrecklichen Ausklang führen…

Quartalsweise sollen weitere Abenteuer folgen, welche in Asien, Südamerika und Afrika spielen werden.

Auch der Cthulhu-Blog berichtet: http://www.cthulhu.de/artikel/goodman-games-bringt-neue-cthulhu-szenarios

Diskussion im GK-Forum dazu.